At a glance
Key facts
- Powertrain
- Hybrid
- Seating
- 5
- Dimensions
- 5,085x1,999x1,912 mm
- Total Range (km)
- 1,470CLTC full-fuel/full-charge combined; electric-only CLTC separately · Not directly comparable
- Power
- 830 kW
- Charging
- -
Available specifications
24 fields · 2 unavailable fields
PHYSICAL SCALE
Side, top and front dimension boundaries.
- SIDE VIEW (LENGTH × HEIGHT)
- 5,085 × 1,912 mm
- TOP VIEW (LENGTH × WIDTH)
- 5,085 × 1,999 mm
- FRONT VIEW (WIDTH × HEIGHT)
- 1,999 × 1,912 mm
LAUNCH
- Released
- 2026-10-10
BODY
- Representative Configuration
- 270km 2.0T 三电机四驱 顶峰版
- Body Type
- SUV
- Dimensions
- 5,085x1,999x1,912 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,900 mm
- Weight
- 2,750 kg
- Seating
- 5
- Other equipment
- Onboard refrigerator (Optional; 18.5L refrigerator is explicitly a limited-time free gift; preserve optional status.) · Privacy glass
PERFORMANCE
- Power
- 830 kW
- 0-100 km/h
- 3.95 s
- Max Speed
- 220 km/h
- Drive Type
- AWD
- Suspension
- Air suspension (Varies by configuration; Explore pair: not included. Yufeng: absent; Yufeng+: included. Dingfeng: included; Land Ark: absent, active hydraulic suspension instead.)
ENERGY
- Powertrain
- Hybrid
- Total Range (km)
- 1,470CLTC full-fuel/full-charge combined; electric-only CLTC separately · Not directly comparable
- Electric Range (km)
- 270CLTC full-fuel/full-charge combined; electric-only CLTC separately · Not directly comparable
- Battery
- 47.14 kWh
- Charging
- -
- Fuel Tank
- 80 L
- Fuel Consumption
- 7.25 L/100 kmTest basis unspecified
DRIVER ASSISTANCE
- Driver Assistance Level
- -Driver supervision remains required; the checked source does not establish an SAE automation level.
Marketplace search
Search this model
Model search only
Disclosure: When marketplace search links become active, CompareAll may earn a commission. Commercial relationships never change product facts, ordering, or editorial conclusions.
- Geely Galaxy Zhanjian 700 270 km AWD (2026)
Marketplace search is not connected for this model.
Continue researching
Compare in context
Related comparisons
No editorial comparison is published for this entity.