ACEMAGIC F9A PRO 495

Buying advice

This F9A is a candidate for local AI experimentation or large creative projects whose software supports the Radeon platform and benefits from 192GB of shared CPU/GPU memory. The supplied 2TB SSD and dual 2.5GbE suit keeping projects locally and moving data over a wired network. Compare a lower-memory mini for office or lighter projects; choose by software support if your workflow depends on a particular GPU backend. Shared-memory capacity does not establish inference speed, and OCuLink expansion adds separate hardware and space requirements.

Available specifications

35 fields · 13 unavailable fields

LAUNCH

Released: -

GAMING PERFORMANCE

PS5 (2024) = 100

Gaming Performance Index (GPI): Reference estimate · Not measured on this computer≈120100 is a PS5 (2024) reference, not a maximum. Relative displayed values are not game FPS ratios or a winner.
Reference estimate · Conditions & method
Reference estimates can use different methods and configurations. Bar lengths are not precise gaming comparisons, FPS ratios or target-computer rankings.
Method: Transcribed benchmark reference
PS5 (2024) = 100
Historical GPU or named-configuration reference, not a measurement of this computer. CPU, memory, driver, power and cooling may differ.
Donor: 192GB unified memory, 120W mode. Graphics 12033 is an editorial transcription; the original video frame was not verified. Target and donor conditions may differ.

GRAPHICS BENCHMARKS

3DMark Time Spy: -
3DMark Steel Nomad: -
3DMark Steel Nomad Light: -
Geekbench 6 Metal: -

CPU BENCHMARKS

Geekbench 6 Single: Conditions unconfirmedAMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 4952,978Chip reference
Test conditions & details
Test: Geekbench 6 Single
Score unit: points
Version: 6.4.0
Recorded test: CPU single-core
Power mode: Unknown
OS: Unknown
Sample count: 1
Bars align retained values of the same metric and unit. Test conditions may be unconfirmed. The endpoint is a display scale, not a test maximum, comparable device measurement, game FPS ratio or winner.
Geekbench 6 Multi: Conditions unconfirmedAMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 49520,213Chip reference
Test conditions & details
Test: Geekbench 6 Multi
Score unit: points
Version: 6.4.0
Recorded test: CPU multi-core
Power mode: Unknown
OS: Unknown
Sample count: 1
Bars align retained values of the same metric and unit. Test conditions may be unconfirmed. The endpoint is a display scale, not a test maximum, comparable device measurement, game FPS ratio or winner.

OTHER BENCHMARKS

PCMark: -

PLATFORM & HARDWARE

OS: Windows 11 Pro
Processor: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495
GPU: AMD Radeon 8065S
Chipset: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495
CPU Cores: 16
GPU Cores: 40
NPU: 55 TOPS
GPU FP32 TFLOPS: -

MEMORY & STORAGE

Memory: 192 GB
Storage: 2,000 GB
Current Configuration: {"processor":"AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495","gpu":"AMD Radeon 8065S","ram_gb":192,"storage_gb":2000,"basis":"Exact selected official store offer"}
Storage options: 1000 GB / 2000 GBIndependent capacity options; not confirmed combinations.

EXPANSION

Upgradeability: -

POWER & BATTERY

Cooling: Copper base and five heatpipes with turbine fan
Power: -

BODY & DIMENSIONS

CHASSIS SIDE · LENGTH × HEIGHT: -
CHASSIS TOP · LENGTH × WIDTH: -
Dimensions: -
Weight: 1.4 kg

CONNECTIVITY & EXPANSION

Display Outputs: HDMI2.1,DP2.1,2×USB4 DP2.0; vendor claims up8K60
Network: -
Ports: 3×USB3.2 Gen2-A,USB2-A,2×USB4-C40Gbps,HDMI2.1,DP2.1,dual2.5GbE,SD,audio combo,line-out,OCuLink PCIe4x4,DC
Wireless: Wi-Fi 7 / BT 5.4

OTHER SPECIFICATIONS

Brand: ACEMAGIC
Model: F9A PRO 495
Type: mini_pc

Overview

Suited to a desk-based local-AI or creative workflow that benefits from unified memory. Check application compatibility and the configuration that fits your workload before ordering.

Marketplace search

Search this model

Model search only

Disclosure: When marketplace search links become active, CompareAll may earn a commission. Commercial relationships never change product facts, ordering, or editorial conclusions.

ACEMAGIC F9A PRO 495
Marketplace search is not connected for this model.

Continue researching

No editorial comparison is published for this entity.